Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: https://dspace.chmnu.edu.ua/jspui/handle/123456789/2211
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorBabichev, S.-
dc.contributor.authorLiakh, I.-
dc.contributor.authorKalinina, I.-
dc.date.accessioned2024-05-10T08:25:34Z-
dc.date.available2024-05-10T08:25:34Z-
dc.date.issued2023-
dc.identifier.issn2076-3417 el.-
dc.identifier.urihttps://www.webofscience.com/wos/woscc/full-record/WOS:001099489500001-
dc.identifier.urihttps://www.mdpi.com/2076-3417/13/21/11823-
dc.identifier.urihttps://dspace.chmnu.edu.ua/jspui/handle/123456789/2211-
dc.descriptionBabichev, S., Liakh, I., & Kalinina, I. (2023). Applying a Recurrent Neural Network-Based Deep Learning Model for Gene Expression Data Classification. Applied Sciences-basel, 13 (21), art. no. 11823. DOI: 10.3390/app132111823uk_UA
dc.description.abstractThe importance of gene expression data processing in solving the classification task is determined by its ability to discern intricate patterns and relationships within genetic information, enabling the precise categorization and understanding of various gene expression profiles and their consequential impacts on biological processes and traits. In this study, we investigated various architectures and types of recurrent neural networks focusing on gene expression data. The effectiveness of the appropriate model was evaluated using various classification quality criteria based on type 1 and type 2 errors. Moreover, we calculated the integrated F1-score index using the Harrington desirability method, the value of which allowed us to improve the objectivity of the decision making when model effectiveness was evaluated. The final decision regarding model effectiveness was made based on a comprehensive classification quality criterion, which was calculated as the weighted sum of classification accuracy, integrated F1-score index, and loss function values. The simulation results show higher appeal of a single-layer GRU recurrent network with 75 neurons in the recurrent layer. We also compared convolutional and recurrent neural networks on gene expression data classification. Although convolutional neural networks showcase benefits in terms of loss function value and training time, a comparative analysis revealed that in terms of classification accuracy calculated on the test data subset, the GRU neural network model is slightly better than the CNN and LSTM models. The classification accuracy when using the GRU network was 97.2%; in other cases, it was 97.1%. In the first case, 954 out of 981 objects were correctly identified. In other cases, 952 objects were correctly identified.uk_UA
dc.language.isoenuk_UA
dc.publisherMDPIuk_UA
dc.subjectgene expression profilesuk_UA
dc.subjectrecurrent neural networkuk_UA
dc.subjectdeep learninguk_UA
dc.subjectclassification quality criteriauk_UA
dc.subjectgrid search algorithmuk_UA
dc.subjectcancer diseaseuk_UA
dc.titleApplying a Recurrent Neural Network-Based Deep Learning Model for Gene Expression Data Classificationuk_UA
Appears in Collections:Публікації науково-педагогічних працівників ЧНУ імені Петра Могили у БД Web of Science

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
Babichev, S., Liakh, I., Kalinina, I..pdf1.92 MBAdobe PDFView/Open


Items in DSpace are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.